Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized the BJP’s commitment to a single flag and Constitution in Jammu and Kashmir, citing the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. He emphasized that the concept of “one flag, one prime minister, one Constitution” was not a political slogan, and the BJP implemented it in the region.
Shah questioned the political slogan “ek nishan, ek pradhan, ek samvidhan” (one flag, one head, one Constitution) in Lok Sabha, comparing it to the concept of having two prime ministers, two constitutions, and two flags.
Why is this narrative important; ‘One flag, one constitution’
“One flag, one constitution” typically connotes a sense of unanimity and a single national identity. It highlights how crucial it is to have a single flag and constitution as representations of a cohesive and undivided country. It’s essential because the principles of “One Flag, One Constitution” assist in establishing an effective, cohesive community by promoting a feeling of identity and purpose among its varied populace. A unified body of rules and a single, potent symbol—the national flag—serve as the means of achieving this unity.
One Flag: The importance of having a national flag that symbolizes the entire nation is emphasized in this section. An effective representation of a country’s identity, heritage, and ideals is its flag. The concept of “one flag” implies that all citizens are united by a shared identity, even in the face of national diversity.
One Constitution: The significance of having a single constitution that acts as the foundational legislation of the country is emphasized in this section. A constitution usually describes the ideas that guide the country, the rights and obligations of individuals, and the organization of the government. “One constitution” strengthens the notion of a single set of laws that all citizens must abide by.
The “One Flag, One Constitution” concept
The concept of “One flag, one constitution” is a symbol of national identity and unity within a political entity. It promotes national cohesion and discourages separatism or regionalism. A single, unifying flag represents all citizens, while a constitution serves as the supreme law binding regions and communities together. This concept is often used in debates related to national identity, autonomy, or federalism. Advocates of a strong central government and national unity may use this phrase to counterbalance decentralization and preserve the nation-state’s integrity, while others may criticize it for suppressing diversity and local autonomy.
National unity is crucial for effective governance and a singular flag serves as a powerful tool to unite diverse populations under a common set of principles. This unifying concept prevents secessionist tendencies and promotes equal citizenship, preserving national integrity. A single flag also facilitates effective engagement with other nations and international organizations. However, it is essential to approach the application of this concept with sensitivity and awareness of the unique historical, cultural, and political circumstances of each nation. Balancing unity and stability with respect for diversity and minority rights is crucial. Flexibility in governance structures is necessary to ensure responsiveness to evolving needs.
Amit Shah praises PM Modi
Amit Shah, the Union Home Minister, referred to the repeal of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 when he stated on Tuesday that the government has made sure the nation has just one flag and one Constitution. According to him, the idea of “one flag, one prime minister, one Constitution” is not just a catchphrase; the BJP believes in it and has now put it into practice concerning Jammu and Kashmir.
Amit Shah said in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday that the Narendra Modi administration made sure India has “one flag and one constitution.” He was presumably alluding to the 2019 repeal of Article 370 when he stated that the BJP sincerely believed in the idea and put it into practice in J&K. Shah was reacting to comments made by Saugata Roy of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), who referred to the phrase as “political.”
Comments 3